Bail out homeowners
I applaud Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., for telling The Wall Street Journal that the government's bailout efforts aren't doing enough to help homeowners.
She's right.
I was thinking about the reasoning behind not helping homeowners, which seems to be the moral hazard argument. That if we help the bad borrowers, who knew they couldn't afford their homes, that we are making it penalty-free to engage in bad, risky, damaging behavior. Borrow money for whatever, and you won't even need a get out of jail free card.
There's another way to think of it. We are bailing out banks but not homeowners. So they get the Get of Jail Free cards? We don't seem to be worried about moral hazard among financial institutions for what reason exactly? Are we assuming they don't behave badly?
Here's my response on the homeowner front:
Not long ago, many thousands of honest workers in the mortgage industry had the expertise it takes to pick a good borrower from a bad one. They spent their days evaluating and verifying loan applications, making judgments on whether to approve them.
That stopped at some point. A few years ago, when I went to refinance my mortgage, the approval came from software on a bank officer's screen. No one had to be spoken to. Paperwork wasn't checked.
Compare that to the first time I went to get a mortgage.
That was a huge ordeal, because our income was not verifiable. My husband was an attorney. When he won a case, he had money. When he did not, we did not. We had up and down income.
I wrote a huge explanation statement for our mortgage broker. I had to explain, too, all the flaws on our credit report that came from being young, with kids, and in debt. We got a loan, but at a high rate of interest.
None of that was required later. Just poof on the screen, your credit score is good enough.
I'm glad it was. But I was prepared, with a briefcase full of papers, to make my case. No one asked.
The expertise to separate out borrowers, I'm going to guess, has not evaporated.
This body of knowledge seems to have just been shoved aside. In its place are some stupid lending models that relied on the pseudo-science of a number, a credit score, as the great predictor.
I know they're stupid. Look how they turned out.


Previous entry:
Next entry:
Harriet Johnson Brackey, the personal finance writer for the Sun-Sentinel, has been an award-winning business...

Comments
Regarding mortgage lenders. here's what changed:
They learned that their profits came from making loans. As long as the borrower did not default within six months, they kept their fees. Thus, their goal became: make as many loans as possible.
Because these lenders did not maintain ownership of the loans, they no longer cared whether the borrower was going to pay back the loan. Thus there gaol became: make as many loans as possible.
It's just greed; passing the buck; and not having any respect for anyone.
On Wall Street, the likes of Bear and Lehman etc. were making tons of money, so they increased their leverage.
The banks and mortgage companies were profiting from making mortgage loans and from trading mortgage backed securities, so they upped the number of loans.
It's not complicated: Unregulated industries cannot be trusted (how sad is that?) to take care of anyone but themselves.
At one time Americans had pride in themselves, in the quality of their work, and in being good citizens. Sadly, the new mantra is 'what's in it for me?'
Posted by: Mark Wolfinger | October 17, 2008 1:58 PM
The lending models were crazy but no one forced people to take insane loans. I am not completely opposed to helping homeowners except that it would seem to maintain the inflated house prices. That may be good if you own a home, not so great if you rent like I do.
I make what is supposedly decent money yet there is no way that I can currently buy in S.Fl.
To be blunt I would like to see prices drop to the levels of the mid to late 90's. Only then will you really see real estate start to sell again.
Posted by: dave2 | October 17, 2008 9:21 PM
I find it amazing that one of the largest and most powerful industries, not just in the states but in the world, arguably is largely unregulated. Bankers can and do lose millions and still receive large bonuses. Hopefully this time things will change because let's face it, there really can't be a 'next time'.
Posted by: Warren | October 20, 2008 6:12 PM
I find it amazing that one of the largest and most powerful industries, not just in the states but in the world, arguably is largely unregulated. Bankers can and do lose millions and still receive large bonuses. Hopefully this time things will change because let's face it, there really can't be a 'next time'.
Posted by: Warren | October 20, 2008 6:14 PM