South Florida Sun-Sentinel


previous Previous entry: Money Smarts for the 30s
previous Next entry: What you need to get a new mortgage

Back to main page

Which President is Good for Stocks?

Who's worse for the stock market, Bush or Obama?
The market offers equal opportunity for each camp to cause investors to lose money.

Obama's inauguration was the worst inaugural day performance in history. The Dow swooned, falling 4 percent, more than 300 points. It's still hovering around where it landed that day, at 7,949.09


But what about Bush?
(Hint, markets duriing the previous presidency suffered from the tech stock bubble bursting, 9/11 and today's mortgage/housing/credit meltdown)


Wilshire Assocates provided this data on the very broad market index, the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000. The annualized total returns are:





President, First Term, Second Term, Total
Ronald Reagan 12.1%, 16.1%, 14.1%
Geroge H.W. Bush 14.5%, Didn't have one , 14.5%
Bill Clinton 17.7%, 13.5%, 15.6%
George W. Bush 1.0%, -6.8% -3.0%

POSTED IN: Wall Street (14)

Discuss this entry

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/121095

Comments

Bobblehead idiot reporter. Hint: democrats are responsible for both stock market collapses Bush had to endure. Hint: under Bush's presidency, the DOW hit 14,000, something it had never done before. Hint: get a life.

Post a comment

To help keep spam off our site, please enter the letter "i" in the field below:

About This Blog

You've got the job of managing your money. No one in school taught you how.

But you and I, we can teach each other, how to handle it, how to save for retirement, how to make money... < More >

Harriet Johnson Brackey Harriet Johnson Brackey, the personal finance writer for the Sun-Sentinel, has been an award-winning business...< More >

Powered by Movable Type 3.36
Hosted by LivingDot

Add It's Your Money: Personal finance | Sun-Sentinel Blogs to Technorati Favorites