Attorney General's Office Nixes Deerfield's Proposed Texting Ban
Two weeks before a law banning texting while driving was set for a public hearing and final approval, the state attorney general's office has ruled states can ban texting but not municipalities.
City Attorney Andy Maurodis said the ruling, on Nov. 9, effectively derails Deerfield Beach’s ordinance. That ordinance was set for a second reading and possible approval on Nov. 23. In light of the attorney general’s finding, Maurodis said "It is not going to be on the agenda.”
It was at Maurodis' request that the attorney general's office considered the question at all and, Maurodis said, the outcome was not a surprise. In a letter to Maurodis, Assistant Attorney General Gerry Hammond said, that cities could pass local laws only if it was for a locally relevant reason. “The only limitation on the power of municipalities is that such power must be exercised for a valid municipal purpose," wrote Hammond in a letter to Maurodis. He added that when municipal law conflicts with state law, state law prevails.
"The concern expressed by legislative staff was the possibility that regulations may be enacted that differ from city to city and county to county,” Hammond specified in the letter. “[That caused] concerns for some who envision a scenario in which a driver lawfully using a cell phone in one jurisdiction might cross into another jurisdiction where the behavior is outlawed.”
The ruling Nov. 12 could have ramifications for surrounding communities. Parkland passed a texting ban in October. Pembroke Pines has asked its attorney to draft a resolution for review, and parallel ordinances are under way in Pembroke Pines, Lauderhill and Coral Springs.
“When Parkland adopted theirs, they knew there was an issue. They decided to ask the attorney general’s opinion,” explained Maurodis in his letter. “And they decided that while they were waiting, they were not going to enforce the ordinance.”
They made the right decision, according to Hammond, in the letter to Maurodis.
His letter concludes that “[...] legislative history [...] expresses the Legislature’s determination to preempt to the state regulation of the use of cellular telephones and other electronic communication devices by both the driver of a motor vehicle and any passengers. [...] Thus it would appear that the Legislature has reserved to itself the regulation of 'texting.' ”
Could it be far behind?






ELIZABETH ROBERTS