South Florida Sun-Sentinel

> To return to the main page of Get Local Wellington, please click here.

« April 2008 | Main | September 2008 »

July 28, 2008

I can hear it, can you?

You know that little ditty from "The Sound of Music", sung at the abbey just after the beginning. You know the one. It's called "Maria".

The nuns sing so nicely, "What are we going to do about Maria?" But in Wellington, it is "What are we going to do about K Park?"

So many options. So many choices. Let's see, a community college. A medical campus. A business park.Anything else out there? There is one commonality though ... they all want the land donated.

Which leads me to some other song lyrics. This time from Meatloaf's "Paradise by the Dashboard Light". Those lyrics would be ... "Stop Right There."

What is the rush here? Why unravel years of work by Village Staff, the PRAB and Council when we got this land. Probably four years of work. Now, after just a few months in office the new Village Council wants to unravel this at warp speed? Why?

First, we should all get together and tell Council and Staff that there will be no support for a donation of this land. It is worth $300K to $500K an acre ... if they are so hellbent on getting rid of the land ... sell it. Especially in these times of economic difficulties the Village faces in the next few years. NO DONATIONS OF K PARK. To any organization. Including PBCC.

Second, if I were Sunrise Senior Living and land were donated for any reason ... I would be back in front of Council asking for my money back. After all, if they get it for free, why shouldn't they get it for free. Heck, at least they will be paying property taxes.

Third, in this time of increasing fuel costs, wouldn't it be nice to have an "employment center" in Wellington that would be office-based -- not retail-based (don't we have enough already?). People could live and work in the community ... supporting all those retail merchants and having a two or three mile commute and not a twelve or fifteen or more mile commute?

Fourth, we will need the park space. Trust me, after 10 years on the PRAB we will need it. That's why the Village went out and got it.

Fifth, oh, doesn't that proposal from earlier in the year that was completely disregarded by Council look pretty good now?

We need to tell the mayor that donating the land to anyone is not appropriate. No matter what anyone says. Then we need to tell each of the Council members.

We need to be vocal about it. Let's not let the Council make another decision that does not serve the interest of the community.

What do you think?

POSTED IN: Government (20)

Discuss this entry

July 10, 2008

"History repeats itself, it has to, nobody listens"

This quote is from an English writer by the name of Steve Turner. You may ask, "why start with that quote?"

It is for a simple reason. This article.

Once upon a time, both recreation baseball and travel baseball were under the guidance of one sports provider. It did not work.

And putting them together now will not work. Let me share with you why it won't work.

In two simple words -- competing interests.

Recreation programs are primarily educational in nature. They are designed to give children the basics of the game and allows them to sample various athletic programs to find out which interests them the most.

Travel, sometimes referred to as competitive, teams are assembled to play against other teams from outside the local area.

And that's not all. Assuming there is a spot available, if your child signs up for recreational baseball, there is a "you pay, your child plays" standard.

Not so with travel teams. There are try-outs and only the best children are chosen for the teams. And there is no guarantee that you child will play in each game. That is just the nature of the beast.

Travel teams have higher costs than recreation teams. Higher enrollment fees and associated travel costs require a much higher commitment from children and parents in travel programs than in recreation programs.

Travel teams play almost year round. Recreation teams play 2 short seasons, roughly 2 months in the fall and 3, sometimes 4, months in the spring.

Those of you with short memories may recall what happened about 8 years ago when these two programs were run by one board. Conflict. Constant conflict that came to staff's attention and then to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board's attention.

In a compromise, to alleviate these conflicts, Debbie Brisson (then Parks & Rec Director) developed a plan that seemed to fit everyone's needs. It was fair and very structured on how the transition was to occur.

Frankly, it was a consensus between the two interests. To refresh your memory, a consensus is common ground where people can agree on most issues and can live with the decisions made on issues on which they do not agree. The fact of the matter is that it worked.

Occasionally, there were spats, but lovers (of the game) often have these. They were able to work things out and the two providers co-existed very well for years.

This brings a thought to mind. Actually a quote by George Santayana: "Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it."

Trust me on this, if the Village merges these two teams, both programs will be negatively affected. Yes, the recreation program will get sole access to the fields. The travel teams will be chased away. And the community will be worse off for it. In the end, the same old problems will rear their heads and the battle for separation of the two programs will begin anew.

Why has this come to the forefront you may ask.

All of this brouhaha revolves around a parent whose child did not make one of the travel teams and he raised enough stink about it to move it to this point. I have written on this before and will just say this is the squeaky wheel getting the grease.

The bottom line is this: the excuse of non-resident make-up of teams is being used as the scapegoat. I call bull on this. There is no requirement for Wellington residents to play in Wellington programs, so why should there be such a big issue over this. After all, if it is about money, non-residents pay more so the Village should be welcoming them with open arms.

What really cracked me up was this statement from the article: "With less money coming into the village after property tax reform, village staff said it was more efficient for parks and recreation staff to deal with only one governing body for baseball. The idea is that the staff member dealing with baseball could help with other duties."

Non-residents pay more, so that helps with economics. Besides, it is not the citizens' job to make staff's job easier. It is staff's job to make the programs available so the citizens can enjoy recreation in the Village.

The solution is easy if anyone really wants to solve this problem. Hire a program coordinator to run recreation baseball just like they do for soccer and bring baseball into the Village. Then let the travel provider run the competitive program. There's enough waste in the Village to find the funds to do this ... someone just has to stand up and say we can do it.

As I said earlier, merging the two programs is a mistake. This decision will alienate Village residents. Is this what we really want? Personally, I do not think so. That's not what local governments are supposed to do ... their job is to embrace the residents.

There are definitely some personal issues some folks have with travel baseball. And personal issues should be disregarded. After all the program is for the children of the Village ... not their parents. You all need to make sure the interests of the children are at the heart of the issue and nothing else.

This is a slippery slope for all of the travel providers. I hope Dr. Falzone and his organization keeps looking over their shoulder, because they are next.

There is a hidden agenda here and I will discuss that next week.

One final quote for your consideration from Karl Marx: "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce." I think we are past the tragedy part.

Share with me your thoughts and feelings on the issue.

POSTED IN: Government (20), Sports & Recreation (4)

Discuss this entry

July 6, 2008

I think it's time to take a new look at Patriotism

After relaxing over the long weekend and gearing up for the political season, I came to realize that patriotism is going to be a key factor in the race.

So let's take a look at patriotism.

Let's begin with a look back at the 56 men that signed the Declaration of Independence.

Five of them were captured by the British, were tortured and died in Bristish hands.

Nine fought and died during the Revolutionary War.

Two lost their sons in the War and another had two of his sons captured by the British.

Twelve lost their homes. Many lost members of their families.

All were men of means and were well educated. Each knew full well that if they were captured, their penalty would be death. Many died in poverty ... wiped out in the war.

For these brave men, patriotism was not abstract. It had dire and immediate consequences. Yet they signed anyway.

What about today? Patriotism seems to be the most abstract of American values and virtues. And it seems that the symbols of patriotism are what we use to define it ... and fight over.

In my mind, many of these symbols are used, on purpose by politicians, to divide us. Exactly opposite of what we want them to be ... symbols of American unity.

There seems to be a great divide on patriotism here and now in America. One side feels that the greatness is based on what we have achieved as a nation. The other side believes that our greatness as a nation is based in our promise in the future and what we, as a nation, stand up for when we define our ideals.

Now, most of you will take some sort of offense at the following two statements ... but they are the underlying causes of why we, as a nation, do not come together more often.

Conservatives will contend they are the true keepers of our nation's heritage and attack liberals by stating they are ashamed of America. Liberals, in response, say conservatives prevent America from living up to its ideals.

And they are both wrong.

What we need to have is a view of patriotism that combines the two. We need to recognize what is great about America. Why so many want to come here. After all, you rarely hear that people want to go to Britain. Or Russia. Or China. No they want to come here for the vast land of opportunity we have as a nation. But with that realization of what makes us a great nation is the necessary appreciation for what we have to do (and did) to create and sustain that greatness.

When it comes to patriotism, conservatives and liberals need each other. The love of country requires not only affirmation, but an open mind to criticism.

Waving the flag is supposed to be a call to action. When it comes down just to the end itself, then we lose the dignity of the action and result we can create together. We must guard against the flag becoming an emblem of hypocrisy and complacency.

We should be proud of what America has accomplished and what it has yet to accomplish. For most of human exisitence, tyranny has been the standard. America has stepped away from that philosophy.

We aren't perfect, but we have become the "exception to the rule" and it started 232 years ago. So, comparing America to any other country is an exercise in futility.

Patriotism entails sacrifice. It is a faith in system of values, ideals and beliefs followed up with action and works. If not, then the promise of America rings falsely.

Our young men and women that have volunteered to fight in Iraq and Afganistan, and the men and women protesting against it, are truer patriots than the American who views it from afar on their televisions, shrugging it off by saying it's too far way. More importantly, they have no sense of conscience, and resulting action, they are willing to state publicly.

Let's look at patriotism in a new light. Let's show our patriotism as though we were the brave fifty-six signers of the Decalration of Independence.

Embrace the virtue of patriotism. Take a stand regardless of the consequence. America needs citizens willing to follow in the steps of the Signers and remind us all that rituals, carried on mindlessly and without passion, can be the true enemy of devotion.

Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln summed it up best in an eloquence to which I can only to aspire:

Jefferson: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Lincoln: "It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.

"It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."

While you're at it, go pick up "The True Patriot" by Eric Liu and Nick Hanauer. It is a great read. And don't forget to teach your kids that America isn't too good to be true.

The topic of patriotism is touched on in Time magazine very well. It is worth the read and I will readily admit that I borrowed liberally from it for this entry.

POSTED IN: Rambling On (14)

Discuss this entry

About This Blog

The Get Local community blogs are written by residents of the community. The Sun-Sentinel does not edit the blogs, nor take responsibility for the contents.

TOM DONGILLA
Dongilla began living the in the Western Communities in 1988 when all the roads were just two lanes...

More

Powered by Movable Type 3.36
Hosted by LivingDot

Add Get Local to Technorati Favorites