<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Spin Cycle</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14" title="Spin Cycle" />
    <updated>2008-07-25T01:20:15Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Inside Long Island, state and national politics and Election 2008</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.36</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Videos: Kennedy, Reagan, Obama in Berlin</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/videos_kennedy_reagan_obama_in.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116166" title="Videos: Kennedy, Reagan, Obama in Berlin" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116166</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-25T01:17:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-25T01:20:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Compare and contrast:...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Compare and contrast:</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hH6nQhss4Yc&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hH6nQhss4Yc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WjWDrTXMgF8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WjWDrTXMgF8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q-9ry38AhbU&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q-9ry38AhbU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Video: NYSUT&apos;s somewhat misleading anti-cap ad</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/video_nysuts_somewhat_misleadi.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116163" title="Video: NYSUT's somewhat misleading anti-cap ad" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116163</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-25T00:21:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-25T00:52:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The New York State United Teachers, which is anxious to insure that New York continues to spend more than any other state on education per student and continues to increase its spending at a faster rate than other big states,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The New York State United Teachers, which is anxious to insure that New York continues to spend more than any other state on education per student and continues to increase its spending at a faster rate than other big states, has a TV ad to try to convince the 75 percent of New Yorkers who favor a cap on property tax increases that it's just a "gimmick."</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CNHdyyls9i0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CNHdyyls9i0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p>The ad calls the cap "one size fits all." Huh? The 4 percent increase per year would be a different amount for every district, because every district starts with a different base -- that's the way percentages work. And it could be ignored if a mere 55 percent of voters wanted to spend more.</p>

<p>The ad also says it takes away local control. Huh? Local school boards and local voters still decide on and approve the budget. How does it take away local control? Totally misleading.</p>

<p>Taking a cue from legislative supporters like Speaker Sheldon Silver, the ad also says "deep cuts to school programs will hurt our kids." Huh? How is a 4 percent annual increase -- a bigger increase than most taxpayers get in their paychecks -- off a base of spending that is the highest in the nation a deep cut? </p>

<p>And how exactly is a circuit breaker an alternative? It's a great way to shift the property tax burden of some of the hardest hit onto the rest of us, but it does nothing to rein in the school spending that's driving the overall tax burden, or the perks NYSUT so zealously protects.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Elections board puts Dahroug on primary ballot</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/elections_board_puts_dahroug_o.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116135" title="Elections board puts Dahroug on primary ballot" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116135</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T21:56:29Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-25T00:20:21Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The Suffolk Board of Elections rejected Thursday the challenge to Democratic state Senate candidate Jimmy Dahroug’s nominating petitions, putting him on the party’s September primary ballot against Broolkhaven Supervisor Brian Foley. The commissioners’ disallowed 243 of Dahroug’s 1,408 signatures,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Rick Brand</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="State Senate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="dahroug724.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/dahroug724.jpg" width="140" height="210" /align=left></p>

<p>The Suffolk Board of Elections rejected Thursday the challenge to Democratic state Senate candidate Jimmy Dahroug’s  nominating petitions, putting him on the party’s  September primary ballot against Broolkhaven Supervisor Brian Foley.</p>

<p>The commissioners’ disallowed 243 of Dahroug’s 1,408 signatures, but  it still left with him with 165 signatures more than minimum of 1,000 names he needed to qualify. </p>

<p>Doug Forand, consultant for Senate Democrats campaign committee who are supporting Foley, said they will pursue their challenge of Dahroug petitions in court, claming 506 of his petition signatures were invalid. Both men are  seeking the right to face 36 year Senate veteran Caesar Trunzo, 82, in the November election.</p>

<p>Dahroug had charged that the effort to knock him off the ballot was “underhanded and shady” tactic he called “an act of desperation by Foley’s campaign” because the supervisor is “nervous about facing me in a primary.” </p>

<p>In other board action, Assembly  challenger Waldo Cabrera’s Conservative petitions were validated on a split vote  with Democratic Commissioner Anita Katz voting to uphold the objection which would have knocked out the petitions. Cabrera, who is also seeking to challenge Assemb. Philip Ramos in a Democratic primary, was challenged for having improperly filed out his acceptence of the Conservative’s nomination. Ramos is also challenging his petitions in court.</p>

<p>And the commissioners unamimously upheld the petitions of Dean Hough, a newly minted Democrat seeking to run a Demnocrat primary against Assemb. Patricia Eddington.</p>

<p>Eddington forces claimed that Hough’s petitions were “permeated with fraud” and that he is not qualified to run because he does not meet state residency requirements. Election officials say those type of challenges can only be resolved by a judge. Hough foes have filed suit to knocked him off the ballot.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, John Zaher’s petitions to run an Independence Party primary against Eddington, the party’s designee, were upheld in a split vote even though the candidate who thought he submitted 201 signatures, was later told that 118 signatures were filed because a number of petition pages were missing. He needed 131 to qualify.</p>

<p>Republican commissioner Cathy Richter Geirer, who voted against the objections, did not return calls for comment.  Eddington supporters have sued to remove Zaher from the ballot.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Spitz: Don&apos;t recall that red hot poker....</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/spitz_dont_recall_that_red_hot.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116121" title="Spitz: Don't recall that red hot poker...." />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116121</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T20:44:07Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T20:56:28Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The folks over at the LoHud blog have sucked it up and waded into former Gov. Spitzer&apos;s testimony to the Public Integrity Commission, released today. In a very lawyerly and hedged way, he denies ever having pledged to shove...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="spitzer724.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/spitzer724.jpg" width="149" height="205" /align=left></p>

<p>The folks over at the<a href="http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/07/24/spitzer-denies-red-hot-poker-comment/"> LoHud blog have sucked it up </a>and waded into former Gov. Spitzer's testimony to the Public Integrity Commission, released today. In a very lawyerly and hedged way, he denies ever having pledged to shove a red hot poker into Joe Bruno's backside.</p>

<p>The exact quote, attributed to Spitzer by Darren Dopp: "F*** him, he's a piece of s***, shove it up his a** with a red hot poker."</p>

<p>Here's Spitzer under oath. Note not only the hedge on the denial, but the overall tendency to use twelve pompous words where one normal one would do:</p>

<p>THE WITNESS: “To the best of my recollection, it did not. Just so it’s clear, I, in my private conversations, do not always use the Queen’s English. And I make no bones about that.</p>

<p>In my public commentary, I think you will see, if you do a complete search of the entirety of my public comments as Governor, you would not see me say anything critical, vulgar, of Bruno.</p>

<p>In my private conversations, occasionally I was, to use your word, passionate. And that is my nature, and the nature of politics. I do not in this conversation recall that, because this was not an issue about which I was passionate then, or now, or at any point in time. There were other issues about which I was, but this was not one of them.” <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The number: 200,000</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/the_number_200000.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116108" title="The number: 200,000" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116108</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T20:13:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T20:15:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary>From AFP: &quot;The crowd was put at more than 200,000 people by Michael Bengsch, media relations officer of Berlin Police. The figure beat Obama&apos;s previous record of 75,000 in Oregon this year.&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>From AFP:</p>

<p>"The crowd was put at more than 200,000 people by Michael Bengsch, media relations officer of Berlin Police. The figure beat Obama's previous record of 75,000 in Oregon this year."</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>McCain response: Who&apos;s more American?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/mccain_response_whos_more_amer.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116101" title="McCain response: Who's more American?" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116101</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T20:00:10Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T20:04:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>McCain, responding to Obama&apos;s speech, shrewdly sees that the key passages presented him to an American audience as a proud American articulating her historic mission to the world. He tries to reclaim the most-American mantle, and sees a little opening...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>McCain, responding to Obama's speech, shrewdly sees that the key passages presented him to an American audience as a proud American articulating her historic mission to the world. He  tries to reclaim the most-American mantle, and sees a little opening in the internationalist feel of Obama's "citizen of the world" phrase:</p>

<p>"While Barack Obama took a premature victory lap today in the heart of Berlin, proclaiming himself a 'citizen of the world,' John McCain continued to make his case to the American citizens who will decide this election. Barack Obama offered eloquent praise for this country, but the contrast is clear. John McCain has dedicated his life to serving, improving and protecting America. Barack Obama spent an afternoon talking about it."</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Dean: Just like Nassau, except for the ocean....</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/dean_just_like_nassau_except_f.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116099" title="Dean: Just like Nassau, except for the ocean...." />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116099</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T19:40:21Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T19:58:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Dean Skelos, in his new role as Senate Republican majority leader, is having to get around a bit and relate to the non-Long-Island parts of NYS. Yesterday, he found himself in Chemung County (you can see it on the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="chemung.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/chemung.jpg" width="143" height="109" /align=left></p>

<p>Dean Skelos, in his new role as Senate Republican majority leader, is having to get around a bit and relate to the non-Long-Island parts of NYS. Yesterday, he found himself in Chemung County (you can see it on the map), and the local TV station reported his pitch this way:</p>

<p>"ELMIRA, N.Y. -- New York State Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos says Chemung County is only slightly different from his native Nassau County."</p>

<p>He went on to note that Chemung had more lakes and no ocean and his point, of course, was that everyone in NY wants the same thing -- better schools, lower taxes and a Republican majority in the NY State Senate.</p>

<p>But the <a href="http://www.thealbanyproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3800">Albany Project suggests </a>he may be reaching just a little too far to find commonalities -- 1.3 million people vs. 91,000, 56 school districts vs. 3, median income $72,000 to $36,000:</p>

<p>"Dean may need more than few more of these "listening tours" upstate."</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Video: Arivaderci, Barack.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/video_arivaderci_barack.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116093" title="Video: Arivaderci, Barack." />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116093</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T19:25:16Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T19:29:03Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Sorry, but some of this stuff is too strange to resist. Here, an Italian reporter wants to know why Obama&apos;s not coming to Italia!...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but some of this stuff is too strange to resist. Here, an Italian reporter wants to know why Obama's not coming to Italia!</p>

<p><embed src="http://services.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1445085911" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=1659982177&playerId=1445085911&viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&domain=embed&autoStart=false&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Wounded vets: Danger if you do, danger if you don&apos;t</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/wounded_vets_danger_if_you_do.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116092" title="Wounded vets: Danger if you do, danger if you don't" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116092</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T19:13:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T19:38:16Z</updated>
    
    <summary> What political operatives spend their time thinking about: Obama is in Germany. If he visits wounded US soldiers at the Army&apos;s Landstuhl medical center, he can be accused of using them as props for politics. If he doesn&apos;t, he...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="germancrowd.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/germancrowd.jpg" width="236" height="344" /align=left></p>

<p>What political operatives spend their time thinking about:</p>

<p>Obama is in Germany. If he visits wounded US soldiers at the Army's Landstuhl medical center, he can be accused of using them as props for politics. If he doesn't, he can be accused of not caring about them as much as adoring crowds in Berlin.</p>

<p>What do you do?</p>

<p>Obama scheduled a visit, then apparently changed his mind and did not visit Landstuhl.</p>

<p>The RNC blasts out a story from Spiegel noting the shift, and an item from the Chicago Tribune's blog: "A Republican friend of the Swamp helpfully points out that Sen. Barack Obama seems to have time to visit the gym for a workout today, but not to visit the troops during his stay in Germany tomorrow."</p>

<p>The Obama campaign issues a statement:</p>

<p>During his trip as part of the CODEL to Afghanistan and Iraq, Senator Obama visited the combat support hospital in the Green Zone in Baghdad and had a number of other visits with the troops.</p>

<p>"For the second part of his trip, the senator wanted to visit the men and women at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center to express his gratitude for their service and sacrifice. The senator decided out of respect for these servicemen and women that it would be inappropriate to make a stop to visit troops at a U.S. military facility as part of a trip funded by the campaign."</p>

<p>McCain response: “Barack Obama is wrong. It is never ‘inappropriate’ to visit our men and women in the military.” <br />
 <br />
Right call, or wrong call?</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
 </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Suozz: Professing hope for Sheldon</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/suozz_professing_hope_for_shel.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116086" title="Suozz: Professing hope for Sheldon" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116086</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T19:03:34Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T19:11:57Z</updated>
    
    <summary>At his press teleconference today promoting an upcoming NYS tour to boost the property-tax cap, Tom Suozzi says he won&apos;t be badgering and threatening legislators the way he did during his 04 Fix Albany campaign, and insists you can&apos;t write...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>At his press teleconference today promoting an upcoming NYS tour to boost the property-tax cap, Tom Suozzi says he won't be badgering and threatening legislators the way he did during his 04 Fix Albany campaign, and insists you can't write off Assembly Speaker Shelly Silver:</p>

<p>"I'm not discouraged by what Shelly has said so far because he hasn't closed the door and he hasn't made any firm demands."</p>

<p>Technically, that's true. He's just said he won't pass the bill the way it stands, whereas Skelos has said he's going to pass the bill exactly as it stands. </p>

<p>Story in Newsday <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/nassau/ny-litax0725,0,113824.story">here.</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Poll: McCain gaining on Iraq, drilling</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/poll_mccain_gaining_on_iraq.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116074" title="Poll: McCain gaining on Iraq, drilling" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116074</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T18:33:53Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T18:48:45Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A new Quinnipiac battleground poll of Colorado, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan shows McCain gaining ground in key states -- esp. CO, MN -- apparently because voters respect his support for the surge, and agree with him on Iraq. A lot...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A new Quinnipiac battleground poll of Colorado, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan shows McCain gaining ground in key states -- esp. CO, MN -- apparently because voters respect his support for the surge, and agree with him on Iraq.</p>

<p>A lot of the polling was done pre-Maliki, so that could change things. But the results seem to show that pundits who thought an improving Iraq would not influence the race were wrong. McCain is making his point, and some voters are listening. From the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/24/AR2008072401330.html?hpid=topnews">WashPost</a>:</p>

<p>"Asked whether they would prefer a 'fixed date' for withdrawal or to 'keep troops in Iraq until the situation is more stable,' majorities in all four states preferred the latter option despite the fact that similar majorities in each state say that America was wrong to go to war in Iraq. </p>

<p>"Those results suggest that while Obama's initial opposition to the war plays well with voters, his plan to remove troops from the country within 16 months of taking office as president is less well received."</p>

<p><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/07/john-mccain-pic.html#more">Another shift: drilling</a>. One in ten voters say they've changed their minds and now support offshore drilling -- just like McCain.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Obama: The speech</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/obama_the_speech.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116048" title="Obama: The speech" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116048</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T17:58:59Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T18:30:25Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Prepared text of Obama&apos;s speech after the jump. Big crowd, one-world/break-down-walls substance, but watching on TV you didn&apos;t have the impression the crowd was going totally wild. Echoes of Reagan&apos;s tear-down-this-wall speech, and an effort -- as he has throughout...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Prepared text of Obama's speech after the jump. </p>

<p>Big crowd, one-world/break-down-walls substance, but watching on TV you didn't have the impression the crowd was going totally wild.</p>

<p>Echoes of Reagan's tear-down-this-wall speech, and an effort -- as he has throughout the campaign -- to define himself as all-American (including, yesterday, a $5 million Olympic ad buy). One passage:</p>

<blockquote>"People of Berlin – people of the world – this is our moment. This is our time. 

<p>"I know my country has not perfected itself. At times, we’ve struggled to keep the promise of liberty and equality for all of our people. We’ve made our share of mistakes, and there are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions. </p>

<p>"But I also know how much I love America. I know that for more than two centuries, we have strived – at great cost and great sacrifice – to form a more perfect union; to seek, with other nations, a more hopeful world. Our allegiance has never been to any particular tribe or kingdom – indeed, every language is spoken in our country; every culture has left its imprint on ours; every point of view is expressed in our public squares.</p>

<p>"What has always united us – what has always driven our people; what drew my father to America’s shores – is a set of ideals that speak to aspirations shared by all people: that we can live free from fear and free from want; that we can speak our minds and assemble with whomever we choose and worship as we please.</p>

<p>"These are the aspirations that joined the fates of all nations in this city. These aspirations are bigger than anything that drives us apart. It is because of these aspirations that the airlift began. It is because of these aspirations that all free people – everywhere – became citizens of Berlin. It is in pursuit of these aspirations that a new generation – our generation – must make our mark on the world.</blockquote></p>

<p><img alt="tiergarten.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/tiergarten.jpg" width="420" height="270" /></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Thank you to the citizens of Berlin and to the people of Germany. Let me thank Chancellor Merkel and Foreign Minister Steinmeier for welcoming me earlier today. Thank you Mayor Wowereit, the Berlin Senate, the police, and most of all thank you for this welcome. </p>

<p>I come to Berlin as so many of my countrymen have come before. Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen - a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world. </p>

<p>I know that I don't look like the Americans who've previously spoken in this great city. The journey that led me here is improbable. My mother was born in the heartland of America, but my father grew up herding goats in Kenya. His father - my grandfather - was a cook, a domestic servant to the British. </p>

<p>At the height of the Cold War, my father decided, like so many others in the forgotten corners of the world, that his yearning - his dream - required the freedom and opportunity promised by the West. And so he wrote letter after letter to universities all across America until somebody, somewhere answered his prayer for a better life.</p>

<p>That is why I'm here. And you are here because you too know that yearning. This city, of all cities, knows the dream of freedom. And you know that the only reason we stand here tonight is because men and women from both of our nations came together to work, and struggle, and sacrifice for that better life.</p>

<p>Ours is a partnership that truly began sixty years ago this summer, on the day when the first American plane touched down at Templehof.</p>

<p>On that day, much of this continent still lay in ruin. The rubble of this city had yet to be built into a wall. The Soviet shadow had swept across Eastern Europe, while in the West, America, Britain, and France took stock of their losses, and pondered how the world might be remade. </p>

<p>This is where the two sides met. And on the twenty-fourth of June, 1948, the Communists chose to blockade the western part of the city. They cut off food and supplies to more than two million Germans in an effort to extinguish the last flame of freedom in Berlin.</p>

<p>The size of our forces was no match for the much larger Soviet Army. And yet retreat would have allowed Communism to march across Europe. Where the last war had ended, another World War could have easily begun. All that stood in the way was Berlin.</p>

<p>And that's when the airlift began - when the largest and most unlikely rescue in history brought food and hope to the people of this city. </p>

<p>The odds were stacked against success. In the winter, a heavy fog filled the sky above, and many planes were forced to turn back without dropping off the needed supplies. The streets where we stand were filled with hungry families who had no comfort from the cold. </p>

<p>But in the darkest hours, the people of Berlin kept the flame of hope burning. The people of Berlin refused to give up. And on one fall day, hundreds of thousands of Berliners came here, to the Tiergarten, and heard the city's mayor implore the world not to give up on freedom. "There is only one possibility," he said. "For us to stand together united until this battle is won...The people of Berlin have spoken. We have done our duty, and we will keep on doing our duty. People of the world: now do your duty...People of the world, look at Berlin!"</p>

<p>People of the world - look at Berlin!</p>

<p>Look at Berlin, where Germans and Americans learned to work together and trust each other less than three years after facing each other on the field of battle.</p>

<p>Look at Berlin, where the determination of a people met the generosity of the Marshall Plan and created a German miracle; where a victory over tyranny gave rise to NATO, the greatest alliance ever formed to defend our common security. </p>

<p>Look at Berlin, where the bullet holes in the buildings and the somber stones and pillars near the Brandenburg Gate insist that we never forget our common humanity. </p>

<p>People of the world - look at Berlin, where a wall came down, a continent came together, and history proved that there is no challenge too great for a world that stands as one. </p>

<p>Sixty years after the airlift, we are called upon again. History has led us to a new crossroad, with new promise and new peril. When you, the German people, tore down that wall - a wall that divided East and West; freedom and tyranny; fear and hope - walls came tumbling down around the world. From Kiev to Cape Town, prison camps were closed, and the doors of democracy were opened. Markets opened too, and the spread of information and technology reduced barriers to opportunity and prosperity. While the 20th century taught us that we share a common destiny, the 21st has revealed a world more intertwined than at any time in human history.</p>

<p>The fall of the Berlin Wall brought new hope. But that very closeness has given rise to new dangers - dangers that cannot be contained within the borders of a country or by the distance of an ocean. </p>

<p>The terrorists of September 11th plotted in Hamburg and trained in Kandahar and Karachi before killing thousands from all over the globe on American soil. </p>

<p>As we speak, cars in Boston and factories in Beijing are melting the ice caps in the Arctic, shrinking coastlines in the Atlantic, and bringing drought to farms from Kansas to Kenya.</p>

<p>Poorly secured nuclear material in the former Soviet Union, or secrets from a scientist in Pakistan could help build a bomb that detonates in Paris. The poppies in Afghanistan become the heroin in Berlin. The poverty and violence in Somalia breeds the terror of tomorrow. The genocide in Darfur shames the conscience of us all.</p>

<p>In this new world, such dangerous currents have swept along faster than our efforts to contain them. That is why we cannot afford to be divided. No one nation, no matter how large or powerful, can defeat such challenges alone. None of us can deny these threats, or escape responsibility in meeting them. Yet, in the absence of Soviet tanks and a terrible wall, it has become easy to forget this truth. And if we're honest with each other, we know that sometimes, on both sides of the Atlantic, we have drifted apart, and forgotten our shared destiny.</p>

<p>In Europe, the view that America is part of what has gone wrong in our world, rather than a force to help make it right, has become all too common. In America, there are voices that deride and deny the importance of Europe's role in our security and our future. Both views miss the truth - that Europeans today are bearing new burdens and taking more responsibility in critical parts of the world; and that just as American bases built in the last century still help to defend the security of this continent, so does our country still sacrifice greatly for freedom around the globe.</p>

<p>Yes, there have been differences between America and Europe. No doubt, there will be differences in the future. But the burdens of global citizenship continue to bind us together. A change of leadership in Washington will not lift this burden. In this new century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do more - not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect our common security and advance our common humanity. </p>

<p>That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another.</p>

<p>The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down. </p>

<p>We know they have fallen before. After centuries of strife, the people of Europe have formed a Union of promise and prosperity. Here, at the base of a column built to mark victory in war, we meet in the center of a Europe at peace. Not only have walls come down in Berlin, but they have come down in Belfast, where Protestant and Catholic found a way to live together; in the Balkans, where our Atlantic alliance ended wars and brought savage war criminals to justice; and in South Africa, where the struggle of a courageous people defeated apartheid.</p>

<p>So history reminds us that walls can be torn down. But the task is never easy. True partnership and true progress requires constant work and sustained sacrifice. They require sharing the burdens of development and diplomacy; of progress and peace. They require allies who will listen to each other, learn from each other and, most of all, trust each other. </p>

<p>That is why America cannot turn inward. That is why Europe cannot turn inward. America has no better partner than Europe. Now is the time to build new bridges across the globe as strong as the one that bound us across the Atlantic. Now is the time to join together, through constant cooperation, strong institutions, shared sacrifice, and a global commitment to progress, to meet the challenges of the 21st century. It was this spirit that led airlift planes to appear in the sky above our heads, and people to assemble where we stand today. And this is the moment when our nations - and all nations - must summon that spirit anew. </p>

<p>This is the moment when we must defeat terror and dry up the well of extremism that supports it. This threat is real and we cannot shrink from our responsibility to combat it. If we could create NATO to face down the Soviet Union, we can join in a new and global partnership to dismantle the networks that have struck in Madrid and Amman; in London and Bali; in Washington and New York. If we could win a battle of ideas against the communists, we can stand with the vast majority of Muslims who reject the extremism that leads to hate instead of hope.</p>

<p>This is the moment when we must renew our resolve to rout the terrorists who threaten our security in Afghanistan, and the traffickers who sell drugs on your streets. No one welcomes war. I recognize the enormous difficulties in Afghanistan. But my country and yours have a stake in seeing that NATO's first mission beyond Europe's borders is a success. For the people of Afghanistan, and for our shared security, the work must be done. America cannot do this alone. The Afghan people need our troops and your troops; our support and your support to defeat the Taliban and al Qaeda, to develop their economy, and to help them rebuild their nation. We have too much at stake to turn back now. </p>

<p>This is the moment when we must renew the goal of a world without nuclear weapons. The two superpowers that faced each other across the wall of this city came too close too often to destroying all we have built and all that we love. With that wall gone, we need not stand idly by and watch the further spread of the deadly atom. It is time to secure all loose nuclear materials; to stop the spread of nuclear weapons; and to reduce the arsenals from another era. This is the moment to begin the work of seeking the peace of a world without nuclear weapons. </p>

<p>This is the moment when every nation in Europe must have the chance to choose its own tomorrow free from the shadows of yesterday. In this century, we need a strong European Union that deepens the security and prosperity of this continent, while extending a hand abroad. In this century - in this city of all cities - we must reject the Cold War mind-set of the past, and resolve to work with Russia when we can, to stand up for our values when we must, and to seek a partnership that extends across this entire continent.</p>

<p>This is the moment when we must build on the wealth that open markets have created, and share its benefits more equitably. Trade has been a cornerstone of our growth and global development. But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many. Together, we must forge trade that truly rewards the work that creates wealth, with meaningful protections for our people and our planet. This is the moment for trade that is free and fair for all.</p>

<p>This is the moment we must help answer the call for a new dawn in the Middle East. My country must stand with yours and with Europe in sending a direct message to Iran that it must abandon its nuclear ambitions. We must support the Lebanese who have marched and bled for democracy, and the Israelis and Palestinians who seek a secure and lasting peace. And despite past differences, this is the moment when the world should support the millions of Iraqis who seek to rebuild their lives, even as we pass responsibility to the Iraqi government and finally bring this war to a close.</p>

<p>This is the moment when we must come together to save this planet. Let us resolve that we will not leave our children a world where the oceans rise and famine spreads and terrible storms devastate our lands. Let us resolve that all nations - including my own - will act with the same seriousness of purpose as has your nation, and reduce the carbon we send into our atmosphere. This is the moment to give our children back their future. This is the moment to stand as one.</p>

<p>And this is the moment when we must give hope to those left behind in a globalized world. We must remember that the Cold War born in this city was not a battle for land or treasure. Sixty years ago, the planes that flew over Berlin did not drop bombs; instead they delivered food, and coal, and candy to grateful children. And in that show of solidarity, those pilots won more than a military victory. They won hearts and minds; love and loyalty and trust - not just from the people in this city, but from all those who heard the story of what they did here. </p>

<p>Now the world will watch and remember what we do here - what we do with this moment. Will we extend our hand to the people in the forgotten corners of this world who yearn for lives marked by dignity and opportunity; by security and justice? Will we lift the child in Bangladesh from poverty, shelter the refugee in Chad, and banish the scourge of AIDS in our time? </p>

<p>Will we stand for the human rights of the dissident in Burma, the blogger in Iran, or the voter in Zimbabwe? Will we give meaning to the words "never again" in Darfur? </p>

<p>Will we acknowledge that there is no more powerful example than the one each of our nations projects to the world? Will we reject torture and stand for the rule of law? Will we welcome immigrants from different lands, and shun discrimination against those who don't look like us or worship like we do, and keep the promise of equality and opportunity for all of our people?</p>

<p>People of Berlin - people of the world - this is our moment. This is our time. </p>

<p>I know my country has not perfected itself. At times, we've struggled to keep the promise of liberty and equality for all of our people. We've made our share of mistakes, and there are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions. </p>

<p>But I also know how much I love America. I know that for more than two centuries, we have strived - at great cost and great sacrifice - to form a more perfect union; to seek, with other nations, a more hopeful world. Our allegiance has never been to any particular tribe or kingdom - indeed, every language is spoken in our country; every culture has left its imprint on ours; every point of view is expressed in our public squares. What has always united us - what has always driven our people; what drew my father to America's shores - is a set of ideals that speak to aspirations shared by all people: that we can live free from fear and free from want; that we can speak our minds and assemble with whomever we choose and worship as we please. </p>

<p>These are the aspirations that joined the fates of all nations in this city. These aspirations are bigger than anything that drives us apart. It is because of these aspirations that the airlift began. It is because of these aspirations that all free people - everywhere - became citizens of Berlin. It is in pursuit of these aspirations that a new generation - our generation - must make our mark on the world. </p>

<p>People of Berlin - and people of the world - the scale of our challenge is great. The road ahead will be long. But I come before you to say that we are heirs to a struggle for freedom. We are a people of improbable hope. With an eye toward the future, with resolve in our hearts, let us remember this history, and answer our destiny, and remake the world once again.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Obama: Ich bin le president</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/obama_ich_bin_le_president.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116038" title="Obama: Ich bin le president" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116038</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T17:23:15Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T17:29:04Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Obama speaking now, big crowd in Berlin. Luckily for the GOP, no electoral votes:...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Obama speaking now, big crowd in Berlin. Luckily for the GOP, no electoral votes:</p>

<p><img alt="pollineurope.gif" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/pollineurope.gif" width="376" height="262" /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Trooper Report: Why not Spitzer??</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/trooper_report_why_not_spitzer.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116037" title="Trooper Report: Why not Spitzer??" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116037</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T17:11:27Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T17:15:52Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Why didn&apos;t Eliot Spitzer get charged with violating the Public Officers Law, while several people working under him did? Here&apos;s the official answer, from the report: The failure to supervise subordinates, without more, does not violate the Public Officers Law....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why didn't Eliot Spitzer get charged with violating the Public Officers Law, while several people working under him did? Here's the official answer, from the report:</p>

<blockquote>The failure to supervise subordinates, without more, does not violate the Public Officers Law. Similarly, the release of information or documents to the media about a political opponent, without knowledge that such information was confidential or improperly compiled or created (here, through the State Police), does not violate the Public Officers Law. With these standards in mind, and after full consideration of the record evidence, including thousands of documents and over 3,000 pages of sworn testimony, the Commission has determined that presently there is insufficient record evidence to support a charge that any person, other than Baum, Dopp, Howard and Felton, violated the Public Officers Law.</blockquote>

<p>So, their position seems to be that the key misdeed was the creation of records on Bruno's movements, and that they don't have evidence Spitzer knew the material was being improperly compiled.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Albany: Four charged in Troopergate. Not Eliot.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/2008/07/albany_four_charged_in_trooper.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=14/entry_id=116021" title="Albany: Four charged in Troopergate. Not Eliot." />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/news/local/longisland/politics/blog//14.116021</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-24T16:09:10Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-24T16:23:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The state&apos;s Public Integrity Commission has charged four aides to Eliot Spitzer with (civil) violations of the Public Officers Law -- former staff chief Rich Baum, former homeland security aide Bill Howard, former communications chief Darren Dopp, and former...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John Riley</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="darrendopp.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/darrendopp.jpg" width="103" height="109" /align=left></p>

<p><img alt="prestonfelton.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/blog/prestonfelton.jpg" width="88" height="130" /align=right></p>

<p>The state's Public Integrity Commission has charged four aides to Eliot Spitzer with (civil) violations of the Public Officers Law -- former staff chief Rich Baum, former homeland security aide Bill Howard, former communications chief Darren Dopp, and former State Police superintendent Preston Felton.</p>

<p>But not Spitzer himself, which creates a lovely appearance given Dopp's claim that the commission's executive director has long been protecting Spitzer.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.nyintegrity.org/enforcement/NORC-7-24-08.pdf">report is here.</a>  Baum and Howard have admitted violations, Dopp and Felton have not and will get hearings.</p>

<p>The charge is that they "caused the State Police to serve the Governor's and their own non-governmental interests in a manner that compromised the State Police" and "misused their official positions to cause the State Police to engage in conduct that was wholly unrelated to the State Police's statutory mandate" of  detecting and preventing crime.</p>

<p>Testimony -- including Spitzer's testimony -- is posted on the website, <a href="http://www.nyintegrity.org/enforcement/transcripts.html">here</a>. Lotsa pages.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

