The Obama Cabinet's tax problems

The arrogance is breathtaking, and not confined to Wall Street. The latest to surface with tax issues in her background is Gov. Kathleen Sibelius of Kansas, who is being confirmed for HHS secretary.
The way these people get snagged with such regularity (Timothy Geithner being the most egregious; I mean, Secretary of the Treasury, really) you wonder how many others in our government are getting away scot free simply because they're not being considered for cabinet positions.
Not paying social security for their servants? It would be nice to have servants. If I were wealthy enough to afford them, I would certainly feel it was my duty to pay their social security.
Then again, maybe I wouldn't. The above paragraph is only the journalist talking. Wealth and power work a transformation on people. It's easy to say they're rich because they know how to hang onto their money, and not spend it when they think they can get away with it, but there's that entitlement thing. They come to believe they have it because they deserve it.
Government of, for, and by the people. It looked good when Lincoln wrote it on the back of the envelope.
Well, from where I sit, an old envelope is good for just one thing: scratching out the address and reusing it to send a Letter to the Editor.


Previous entry:
Next entry:
CHAN LOWE



Comments
Lord Acton was on target when he said "Power Corrupts."
The Obama Cabinet's tax problems are certainly not unique to Democrat administrations. Presidents tend to surround themselves with criminals since politics is, at its core, a criminal enterprise. The surprising thing is how docile we have become to put up with perpetual corruption.
Posted by: Lolly | April 2, 2009 7:36 PM
Somewhere on a forum, a guy commented about the same subject:
"Boy are we lucky that John McCain did not become president...can you imagine how many he might have with his nominees? "
;-)
Posted by: Phil | April 3, 2009 7:59 AM
It's impossible to know whether McCain would have been better or worse than Obama. The system is the problem. We only had a choice of voting between two factions of the same criminal gang. Goldman-Sachs was going to control the Treasury Department (and hence rob us blind) regardless of who won the election.
Posted by: Lolly | April 3, 2009 2:56 PM