Abortion, Supreme Court

Remember Deep Throat's dictum in All The President's Men? "Follow the money!"
That's what's really behind every Supreme Court fight. Why is it that abortion becomes the number-one criterion for determining whether or not a prospective justice is qualified for the bench...rather than intellect, judicial temperament, scholarship, rigorous analytical powers, or any of the other qualities one might want in someone who occupies such a weighty position?
It's because a Supreme Court opening is the greatest opportunity of all to whip up a frenzy among the respective bases, who then reach reflexively for their checkbooks. It's high-stakes bingo time, folks. Lest we forget, the nominee is ultimately confirmed by politicians. Herein we see both the genius and the Achilles heel of the system designed by the Founding Fathers.
The Achilles heel is that we place so much importance on one subject when a Justice, during his or her career, will wield awesome authority to shape our country and its laws as they pertain to a whole raft of issues.
The genius is that the system encourages the nomination of less extreme candidates, because the President fears the loss of face and prestige if his nominee is rejected, particularly when his own party holds the majority in the Senate.
The best part is that it's bound to be a circus, and we'll all have front-row seats at center ring.


Previous entry:
Next entry:
CHAN LOWE



Comments
The thing that cracks me up the most is all the appointees who get the job, realize they can't be kicked out, and actually read the constitution for the first time. Suddenly they aren't the reliable rubber stamps all the pols thought they had appointed. From Earl Warren to David Souter these pesky justices keep surprising folks (of course there are always counterexamples like Scalia and Thomas :-).
Posted by: Tom | May 4, 2009 8:50 PM
The Madoff scam has International implications with South Florida being the core of activity, i.e. victims and feeders and Madoff himself. Yet there seems to be less current coverage with this newspaper than major newspapers in the country. ----Why
Posted by: Matt Carone | May 12, 2009 3:38 PM