The Lowe Down



<< Previous entry: Crist, Rubio, Florida, senate, election

>> Next entry: John Edwards' cheatin' heart

Chan Lowe: State of the Union


trust.gifEven if you are repulsed by Barack Obama and everything he stands for, you have to agree with one thing he said in his speech last night.

"Not every day is election day." By that, he meant that members of each party are so preoccupied with scoring points at the expense of the other that the welfare of the nation is forgotten in the melee of ego-stoking.

Early on in the health care reform process, for example, the Republicans realized there were short-term political gains to be made by not engaging in the give-and-take. If the whole ugly piece of legislation--warts and all--fails to pass, they will crow with jubilation that Obama's presidency has been mortally wounded. Meanwhile, where does this leave the poor and those with preexisting conditions? Worse off, even, than before.

This hostility hasn't developed overnight. It has taken several decades to fester into what it is today. It has been the norm for so long that there remain very few old-timers who remember the good old days, when parties compromised on legislation just to get it passed, knowing everyone would benefit if there were something in the bill each pol could bring home and point to with pride.

And when the old-timers finally shuffle off, they will take the faded memories of those days with them.

Categories: Barack Obama (150)
submit to reddit
add to delicious


Comments

It is the primaries that do it. Even the moronic "base" can tell the difference between candidates pretending to play to "the base" and genuine fringe lunatics speaking from the heart. They elect the genuine loonies every time, then what choice do we have in the general election when someone other than "the base" shows up?


The Feckless One ran as a centrist and immediately tacked left to satisfy his base. His choice of healthcare and global warming as key goals for Year 1 was completely out of touch with the wants and needs of the electorate. And you complain that the overwhelmingly minority party didn't come along? When tort reform and inter state competition for insurers would completely ruled out because of specials interests?

Please, the Feckless One cannot herd his own party of cats. Don't blame the GOP.


"Early on in the health care reform process, for example, the Republicans realized there were short-term political gains to be made by not engaging in the give-and-take."

You forgot to mention that Obama wanted a, "bill on his desk before the August 2009 recess." It was members of congress who had to come home and get lambasted by their constituents who didn't want a radical takeover of healthcare. Most Republicans just stood back and watched. As for the old timers who will one day shuffle off, I'd be happy to show the the door. The McCain's, Specters, Reid's and Pelosi's of the world might see their political demise earlier than they expected. And that would be a good thing...


This article is way off base. How could the Republicans attempt a compromise on this horrific health care bill?
First it would be detrimental to every American to push it through, secondly how can you compromise with a narcissist president who thinks he is right in every stupid thing he proposes. Maybe if he wasn't so sure he is God the opposition could suggest amendments to this diasasterous bill.


How do you participate in secret negotiations held by the Democrats behind locked doors? Not in the Senate Chambers - behind locked doors.

I guess the President was unaware of this, too.


You must have forgotten that it was the President himselof that brought back his campagn manager to the white house last week. Then he has the audacity to tell others not to pay attention to elections. And for the record Republicans tried to put forth there own ideas for healthcare and had the door slammed shut on them. So please spare me the line that republicans were just trying to stop everything. And with all the ammo that the president gave you to zing him with with political saitre why am I not surprised that you once again focus only on republicans.


The word "Republicans" should not be used in any sentence relating to the failure of the Health Care Reform Bill. The failure rests entirely with the Democrats who, with majorities in both the House and Senate, did not see the need to even bring Republicans into the discussions. Because they could have passed the Health Care Bill entirely on their own without one (1) Republican vote, the only group to bear any blame in this entire fiasco is the Democrats... and we thank them for it.


Maybe I missed something.

I don't recall the Republicans EVER putting forth a FORMAL plan of their own. To this day, the vast majority of Americans support having a Public Option. And where do the Republicans stand on that?

No. The Republicans have done absolutely nothing, but say "no", to virtually every aspect of getting Health reform accomplished.

Lowe is right.


Chan,
Contrary to all the comments, I found your thoughts on health care,etc,etc, unbiased and insightful of the current political situation.
Thank you- you've made my struggle,(to learn the computer) worthwhile.Speaking as a old-timer, it's been a scary,roller-coaster ride but has opened up a whole new world for me.
Reading all the negative comments seem to validate the points you were making...Bravo !!


Gregory - I beg to differ. If a VAST MAJORITY of Americans HAD supported a Public Option, the Health Care bill would be a done-deal. The opposite is true. It's because a VAST MAJORITY of Americans opposed the bill (in it's current form) that it failed. Why else would there have been so much Democrat infighting? They know that a majority of their constituents don't want the bill as it's being proposed now, and that if it is passed against the wishes of those Americans, that they will surely lose their seats. No...I'm sorry, the reason Health Care did not pass is because (enough but not all) Democrats are scared of what it will eventually cost them. Please get your head out of the sand. The fact is, most Americans support Health Care Reform but do NOT support this particular bill. This appears to be a fact that all but you and a remaining handful of Democrats refuse to realize.


"I beg to differ. If a VAST MAJORITY of Americans HAD supported a Public Option, the Health Care bill would be a done-deal."

Nope, just google public option poll numbers. Polls conducted by a wide variety of sources consistently showed numbers of landslide proportion in favor of a public option. One of the main reasons the public is opposed to the current bill is probably because they yanked the public option.

That alone makes it clear that Congress is controlled by special interests, not by the people they are supposed to represent.


Kevin--
As "Anonymous" and I said:
The VAST majority of Americans
Do support the Public Option.
This is FACT!

Anonymous--
The Public Option was yanked due to pressure from the Republican Party, drug companies, et. al.


Ha! The public option has overwhelming support from poll numbers? Take the number of illegal's and lazy welfare slobs out of those polls and you have a different story. What you are left with are legal citizens who work for everything they have. If I was used to living off the fat of the land I would support having a nanny state also. Smarten up...


Leave a Reply

COMMENT BOARD GUIDELINES:

You share in the SunSentinel.com community, so we just ask that you keep things civil. Leave out the personal attacks. Do not use profanity, ethnic or racial slurs, or take shots at anyone's sexual orientation or religion. If you can't be nice, we reserve the right to remove your material and ban users who violate our Terms of Service.


Post a comment


(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

Advertisement
About the author
Chan LoweCHAN LOWE has been the Sun Sentinel’s first and only editorial cartoonist for the past twenty-six years. Before that, he worked as cartoonist and writer for the Oklahoma City Times and the Shawnee (OK) News-Star.

Chan went to school in New York City, Los Angeles, and the U.K., and graduated from Williams College in 1975 with a degree in Art History. He also spent a year at Stanford University as a John S. Knight Journalism Fellow.

His work has won numerous awards, including the Green Eyeshade Award and the National Press Foundation Berryman Award. He has also been a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize. His cartoons have won multiple first-place awards in all of the Florida state journalism contests, and The Lowe-Down blog, which he began in 2008, has won writing awards from the Florida Press Club and the Society of Professional Journalists.
Connect with me


Search this blog
Get text alerts on your phone


Send me the following alerts:

STORM - Weather Alerts
NEWS - Breaking News Alerts
LOTTO - Lottery Numbers
SPORTS - Breaking Sports News
BIZ - Business news headlines
ENT - Entertainment news headlines
DEALS - Free offers and money saving deals


You can also sign up for by texting any of the above keywords to 23539. Standard messaging and data rates apply.
E-mail newsletters
Get the news that matters to you delivered to your inbox. Breaking news, hurricane alerts, news from your neighborhood, and more. Click here to sign up for our newsletters. It is fast, easy and free!