Marlins Stadium Update No. 328i
Random thoughts and tidbits from the trial in the lawsuit filed by auto dealer Norman Braman against Miami-Dade County, the city of Miami and the Marlins over a plan to finance $3 billion worth of projects, including the Marlins' proposed $515 million ballpark:
First: if you haven't read my colleague Mike Berardino's notes from Tuesday's All-Star Game, read them here. MLB officials remain optimistic about the Marlins opening their new ballpark at the site of the Orange Bowl in 2011, but they are a tad concerned about the timing, particularly with the ongoing lawsuit.
What if: What will happen if the ballpark isn't ready in time for the 2011 season? Unclear. The team's lease expires after the 2010 season and Dolphin Stadium officials have previously said the team won't be kicked out if its new home isn't ready. Asked about this issue during the trial Wednesday, Miami-Dade County Manager George Burgess said "My assumption is they'd either renew their lease or it would be up to them and Major League Baseball to find an alternative place to play."
While much of the testimony has focused on the intricate details of bond financing, requirements for public referendums, "paramount public purpose," and ad valorem taxes, there have been some moments of levity.
Oscar v. Super Bowl: During his testimony about the economic benefits of a publicly-financed baseball stadium, University of South Florida economics professor Philip Porter compared stadiums to movie theaters to show that private enterprises don't deserve public dollars. Even though he has repeatedly disputed the economic benefits of Super Bowls and other large events, he acknowledges he is a sports fan who loved attending Super Bowl III at the Orange Bowl when he was growing up in Miami.
The movie theater comparison prompted Assistant County Attorney David Hope to ask Porter what was the last movie he saw in a theater. Practically stumped for an answer, Porter said, "Oh, I don't know...Ben-Hur." The answer elicited laughs from the courtroom.
Hope was questioning Porter about determining quality of life issues. He acknowledged that Ben-Hur, released in 1959, won an Academy Award and wondered which Porter received more enjoyment from - the movie or Super Bowl III? Porter said Super Bowl III.
"Ben-Hur won an Oscar and you still remember Super Bowl III," Hope said.
"It had nothing to do with public subsidies," Porter said.
Dueling cell phones: At one point Wednesday, a cell phone chirped -- a no-no in court. Burgess pointed out the culprit was his wife. Judge Jeri Beth Cohen gave Mrs. Burgess a pass.
She wasn't so lenient with Braman attorney Bob Martinez, whose phone cell phone also began ringing. "Mr. Martinez," Cohen admonished: "Mrs. Burgess's wife is not usually in court."
A red-faced Martinez chuckled about his Bob Marley-playing phone.


Previous entry:
Next entry:



Comments
TV ratings would suggest that the number of Marlin's fans is much higher than those attending the games. An enclosed stadium would go a long way in offering another credible alternative for entertainment to our residents and visitors. I say credible because the Marlin's have proven themselves a worthy addition to MLB winning two World Series. Just look at the talent that the Marlin's have produced or helped produce.
What kind of moron says they love baseball but wants the Marlin's gone anyway? If you live here you can at least enjoy the team you support play when they are in the area or watch the countless of other all-stars that play in our stadium. As for Dolphins Stadium not making a differance to the area it's in... are you serious? Take a look at all the plazas and big name stores around it.
Posted by: JP | August 5, 2008 2:36 PM
I was born and raised and still live in Miami and I love baseball more than just about anything, but I HATE the Marlins. I want them gone!
Posted by: JOE | July 23, 2008 7:15 AM
I will be driving down from Jacksonville this weekend to attend a Marlins game, it is a great family fun event. If the people and city of Miami do not get behind the Marlins and support them it would be better to let them relocate so they can get the support they deserve.
Posted by: Dave | July 19, 2008 11:07 AM
None of the other arenas or stadiums have ever brought any economic benefit to the area. Its all BS they use to get people to accept it. Miami Arena didnt help Overtown, AAA hasnt helped downtown, the area around Dolphins Stadium is just as bad as before the stadium was built. The only ones this will benefit is the Marlins, the 12k fans that attend the games, the corrupt politicians and the contractors. 515 million is alot to spend for a private business and its customers to get a new location. SCREW THAT!!
Posted by: Sergio | July 18, 2008 12:26 AM
It's funny that so much of the arguments revolve around economic benefit/improvement. Yet, nothing has been mentioned of the fact that the government sometimes is just supposed to do what the people want it to do. (That being said I don't believe a real scientific poll has been taken on the subject.)
Posted by: Greg | July 17, 2008 6:43 PM