South Florida Sun-Sentinel
For more Sun-Sentinel sports business coverage, click here.

« Marlins ballpark design: one person's idea | Main | Marlins Stadium Update No. 750Li »

Marlins Stadium Update No. 7,911

The Miami courtroom was packed Thursday afternoon in anticipation of opening statements in the lawsuit filed by auto dealer Norman Braman that targets the financing for the Marlins ballpark.

But Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Jeri Beth Cohen surprised everyone by ordering the sides back into mediation – talks had taken place Tuesday and Wednesday without reaching agreement – to try to reach a settlement. She said the trial would resume Monday morning, meaning it’s possible a settlement could be close.

Braman has said he would drop his suit if the financing for the $515 million ballpark were put to a public vote. That’s not something the defendants – the Marlins, Miami-Dade County and city of Miami – will support. County Manager George Burgess, who was set to testify in the case Friday, said as much Thursday, when asked by a reporter if he’d agree to a referendum.

“Why?” was all Burgess said.

Both sides seem willing to continue talking, but they weren't revealing what a possible settlement might entail.

“If we could work out something that’s positive for the community, that’s been my objective from the very outset,” Braman said. “If it makes sense for the community and makes sense for everybody, I certainly have no objection to it.”

What Braman objects to, among other issues, is the way the city-county plan to fund $3 billion worth of projects by expanding Miami’s Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA) to generate millions in special property tax dollars directs some of those tax dollars to pay down debt on the performing arts center. Those CRA dollars are meant to be used to revitalize areas deemed “slum and blight.”

The Marlins, county and city believe they can win the suit, but whoever loses is expected to appeal. And Braman could take the issue to the Florida Supreme Court.

The team hopes to break ground for the 37,000-seat ballpark at the site of the Orange Bowl in November. While the county could issue the bonds to pay for construction while the case is still in court, it’s not only unlikely, but who would buy those bonds? A delay is also expected to drive up the cost of the ballpark.

The Marlins' lease at Dolphin Stadium expires after the 2010 season.

POSTED IN: Florida Marlins (34), Marlins Stadium Updates (34), Orange Bowl (12)

Discuss this entry

Comments

Who gives a crap about the future of baseball! How about the future of the city and county! There are alot more pressing issues in Miami's future than baseball! Get your head out of your *SS! This is not a priority!

Braman wants his piece of this big pie. And the sad thing is, he'll get it. The Marlins will agree to build some community parks or gyms in projects that will quietly funnel some cash under the table to Braman.

The Marlins have the stronger case, because in a democracy the people elect politicians to govern FOR them. A democracy does not require a vote for EVERYTHING, that's a Republic.

I just wish Braman would stop playing public defender and be quiet. As soon as ground is actually broken, the future of baseball in South Florida is secure.

Post a comment

To help keep spam off our site, please enter the letter "o" in the field below:

About the Author

SARAH TALALAY
After a decade as a news reporter in New Jersey, Southern California, Chicago and South Broward, Talalay decided to trade in covering meetings about city government and schools for meetings about sports deals and stadium finance...

More

Subscribe by email

We'll send every post to your inbox.
Just enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Or subscribe through an RSS reader.

Powered by Movable Type 3.36
Hosted by LivingDot

Add to Technorati Favorites

Business Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory