The Business & Pleasure of Sports

<< Previous entry: Marlins ballpark design: one person's idea

>> Next entry: Marlins Stadium Update No. 750Li

Marlins Stadium Update No. 7,911

The Miami courtroom was packed Thursday afternoon in anticipation of opening statements in the lawsuit filed by auto dealer Norman Braman that targets the financing for the Marlins ballpark.

But Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Jeri Beth Cohen surprised everyone by ordering the sides back into mediation – talks had taken place Tuesday and Wednesday without reaching agreement – to try to reach a settlement. She said the trial would resume Monday morning, meaning it’s possible a settlement could be close.

Braman has said he would drop his suit if the financing for the $515 million ballpark were put to a public vote. That’s not something the defendants – the Marlins, Miami-Dade County and city of Miami – will support. County Manager George Burgess, who was set to testify in the case Friday, said as much Thursday, when asked by a reporter if he’d agree to a referendum.

“Why?” was all Burgess said.

Both sides seem willing to continue talking, but they weren't revealing what a possible settlement might entail.

“If we could work out something that’s positive for the community, that’s been my objective from the very outset,” Braman said. “If it makes sense for the community and makes sense for everybody, I certainly have no objection to it.”

What Braman objects to, among other issues, is the way the city-county plan to fund $3 billion worth of projects by expanding Miami’s Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA) to generate millions in special property tax dollars directs some of those tax dollars to pay down debt on the performing arts center. Those CRA dollars are meant to be used to revitalize areas deemed “slum and blight.”

The Marlins, county and city believe they can win the suit, but whoever loses is expected to appeal. And Braman could take the issue to the Florida Supreme Court.

The team hopes to break ground for the 37,000-seat ballpark at the site of the Orange Bowl in November. While the county could issue the bonds to pay for construction while the case is still in court, it’s not only unlikely, but who would buy those bonds? A delay is also expected to drive up the cost of the ballpark.

The Marlins' lease at Dolphin Stadium expires after the 2010 season.

Categories: Florida Marlins (193), Marlins Stadium Updates (112), Orange Bowl (45)

Leave a Reply


You share in the community, so we just ask that you keep things civil. Leave out the personal attacks. Do not use profanity, ethnic or racial slurs, or take shots at anyone's sexual orientation or religion. If you can't be nice, we reserve the right to remove your material and ban users who violate our Terms of Service.

About the author
CRAIG DAVIS In more than 33 years at the Sun Sentinel, Craig Davis has written about a wide variety of sports topics from baseball to yachting, fishing to triathlons, and also worked as a copy editor and page designer. Recently he reported on local sports, including running, swimming, cycling, equestrian and beach volleyball. He enjoys sports as a participant as well as a spectator, is active in the South Florida running scene plays in the curling club at Saveology Iceplex. This blog offers a glimpse at the business side of sports in the interest of enhancing enjoyment of the games and sporting options as a spectator as well as a participant.
Connect with me

Search this blog
E-mail newsletters
Get the news that matters to you delivered to your inbox. Breaking news, hurricane alerts, news from your neighborhood, and more. Click here to sign up for our newsletters. It is fast, easy and free!