Now that's more like it.
Personal attacks, blood-thirsty passion, anger.
Thank heavens, many of you really aren't comatose out there.
Even Mr. Anonymous, who shouldn't be posting without a real name.
Clearly, everybody missed the words "Devil's advocate" in the last entry.
Actually, Devils was perhaps the wrong terminology, I pray New Jersey's style goes the way of the glowing puck.
Just taking a position for debate.
Just hanging up the pinata for you guys to hammer.
Guess I struck a nerve.
Nick: Of course I remember Bure, Lindros and the long-term deals.
I was writing sidebars and columns during the Stanley Cup Finals at the Garden (you can look it up) and as a fan in the 60s and 70s, shared season tickets in Section 420.
If you've read this journal from Day 1, I've praised Dawes, Dubinsky, Callahan, Pock, took repeated shots at
Renney for playing older vets, especially on D.
Of course Forsberg isn't the answer. They're not going to get him anyway. Philly's asking too much.
But this team is flawed and needs some outside help and it's going to cost them. Brendan Morrison or another center or scoring forward won't come cheap.
And they'll be better off without Forsberg, as long as they use some of the youth to land some offense.
If not, that's OK, it's just "Wait til next year...."
Comments (2)
Sorry Steve I didn't intend to come off as blood thirty or angry
It's just that Forsberg would be another chapter to the Rangers history of adding players on the wrong side of their career
A player in his early 30's with either diminshing skills or a long history of injuries.The Rangers bring these players in with high expectations to only see them implode
The Rangers need a 25 year old Forserg and not the player masquerading as Forsberg.That was my point.His foot is really bothering him
Sorry, forgot to post my name. Annonymous was Justin.